
Currency Wars
Quote of the Day:
…the Eurozone crisis is not just closely related to the unstable recovery of the global economy against the backdrop of the international financial crisis but was also a result of the long term accumulation of internal problems…
Wen Jiabao’s barbed retort to European Council’s Van Rompuy after he failed to turn up to his appointment to meet the Chinese Premier.
Macro Overview
China: Geopolitical Risk From The West
- Obama gave China a public verbal beating the other day telling the World’s growth engine to start behaving like an economic “grown up”. Hmpht! Talk about the pot calling the kettle black. Chinese officials must be laughing at this for sure – who are the Americans to start lecturing people over financial prudence? “Ah, that’s the problem with these democracy-junkies“, they’ll scoff, “as soon as an election appears around the corner they’ll say any old claptrap to get a few votes – even if it is not constructive to the future of the country!“
- But you can feel the uneasiness of a relationship under strain as the US announced that it would station more troops in the Pacific Rim today and ups the ante on the protectionist debate and anti-China rhetoric. I think relationships between the two symbiotic powers of the World are now as tense as they were two years ago when Obama ignored China’s pleas not to meet the Dalai Lama. Remember that day Chinese admirals subsequently refused the customary ceremonial tours as the USS Nimitz in the Hong Kong harbour. As I wrote at the time in my piece, Geopolitical Chess-Moves Between China and the US: “a move which Americans are playing down but are a little shocked by, I think”.
- Never-the-less, attacks on China are coming from many quarters. Europe views China a little more cautiously (perhaps with a little more respect) after they embarrassingly failed to get the so-called “dumb money” to buy into the basket-case that was the EFSF. As Van Rompuy found out (see Quote of the Day above), China is quite prepared to stamp its authority, now that it actually has some.
Christine Lagarde’s New IMF Holds No Punches on Chinese Financial Sector Risk
- Also, after berating Europe and its lack of discipline, the IMF turned East, issuing a stark warning to the Chinese about the precariousness of its banking system. A lot of people have the misconception that China has a limitless amount of cash at its disposal. That is simply not true when you consider the obligations of its own, and if you have to bail out an entire banking system those dollar bills (already being systematically debased) will disappear quicker than an iphone4S in a Central Hong Kong Apple Store – just ask the Europe, hell… just ask the Americans!
- Of course, dear reader, we know the nature of investment risk in China, indeed I wrote in my extensive piece: Prepare for The Dragon’s Fat Tail Risk.
Some of my friends in closer dialogue with Greater China businesses think that magnitude of bank losses due to NPLs may be greater than book equity of the banking sector as a baseline case. Don’t ask what the worst case scenario is, it’s too horrific to put into print.
Rampant lending since the 2008 financial crisis has left many companies and local governments in China with huge debts, while a recent slowdown in economic growth and falling property prices have fuelled fears of an explosion in defaults.
While China’s financial sector was “robust overall”, inefficient credit allocation and other weaknesses needed to be addressed, said Jonathan Fiechter, deputy director of the IMF Monetary and Capital Markets Department.
- But, again, the IMF is not telling us things we didn’t already know, dear reader. Over the months, I’ve made it quite clear that, while leverage and NPL problems in Greater China are bad, if you’re looking at NPLs (and comparing them to equivalent levels of sub prime debt in the US banking system, for instance) then you’re missing the point. The point about having massive state interjection of influence into an allocation process best suited to capitalism is more to do with the, almost entirely immeasurable, latent inefficiencies of capital. Not long ago I sounded a cautionary tale…
- Breakneck Growth in China hides a lot of cracks beneath the surface. I’m not just talking about NPLs it’s the entire nature in which capital is allocated in a business society used to persistently high growth and relatively low inflation.
- This has been touched upon by Peking University Professor, Michael Pettis, in particular in a couple of pieces:
- Small Companies Feel the Pain in China – Pettis
- China Incentives and Debt – Pettis
- To quote a couple of sentences from the second piece:
In all previous cases of countries following similar growth models, the dangerous combination of repressed pricing signals, distorted investment incentives, and excessive reliance on accelerating investment to generate growth has always eventually pushed growth past the point where it is sustainable, leading always to capital misallocation and waste. At this point – which China may have reached a decade ago – debt begins to rise unsustainably.
- I leave you with a quote from Michael Pettis, which I have used before, from a talk which you really must listen to if you care about investing in Asia, or anywhere for that matter (click here: Pettis on China Risk)…
If there is massive mis-allocation [of investment/capital] then you would also expect that which ever sector of the economy is effectively paying for this misallocation, their share of economic wealth should be declining.
Is there such a sector in China? Yes, of course there is: it’s called the household sector…
- I’m not saying that the Chinese growth story will come crashing to an abrupt halt – indeed only yesterday I mentioned the long term growth considerations for China and paraphrased that, eventually, the sun will rise in the East and set in the West. But nothing goes up in a straight line and, if you’re unprepared, the down-shocks can be so violent and persistent it won’t matter what your long term view is. These capital misallocations appear superfluous most of the time and lie dormant as just minor frictional business costs of an economy growing at lightening speed. Until the day they don’t… then all hell breaks loose.
Market Overview
Japan stumbles to new low
- I suppose I should let you know that the Topix – Japan’s equity index closed at a 1.5 year low today at 724 (yes that’s even below the Fukushima/Tsunami close). If we go through 700 that’ll be below the 2008/9 recession levels and the lowest level since (wince!)… 1984 – YIKES! See Chart of the Day.
European Credit Market In Turmoil (still)
- I’m not going to talk about the European markets too much today (its too depressing) I’ll just show you the updated French-German 5 Yr CDS Spread – see Chart of the Day.
Oil Prices – Inflation is back – just when we didn’t need it
- After disappointingly persistent inflation data out of Europe and the US it really looks like the central bankers’ hands are tied. But we know their hands are never tied, they’ve been pretty adept at conjuring excuses to print more up until now. But it’s hard to ignore the facts as we look at light crude bursting through $100 like its on a mission – see Chart of the Day.
Chart of the Day

Tragic Topix (Source: Bloomberg)

France-Germany 5 yr CDS Spread (Source: Bloomberg)

Sweet Light Crude Back Above $100 (Source: Bloomberg)
Events
Macro Events:
Update:
- Spanish GDP Growth – stalled (0.0%)
- Eurozone CPI – persistent (3.0% YoY)
Alerts:
- Bank of Japan– Rates
- Spain GDP
- US Inflation (CPI)
- US Industrial Production
Corporate Events:
Results:
- Pernod-Ricard [RI FP], SAB Miller [SAB LN], San Miguel [SMB PM]
Dividends:
- Capital One [COF], Singapore Airlines [SIA SP],
Reading, Links:
China Risk: